Welcome to GlobalAir.com | 888-236-4309 |    | Please Register or Login
Aviation Articles
Home Aircraft For Sale  | Aviation Directory  |  Airport Resource  |   Blog  | My Flight Department  | MaxTrax
Aviation Articles

Business Aviation Industry Focus: Sabreliner

by Jeremy Cox 1. July 2008 00:00
Share on Facebook

This month we shall take a look at a business jet aircraft that is close to my heart as it is so synonymous with St. Louis. I am referring to the Sabreliner, which is the World's first Twin-Engine Business Jet.

North American Aviation Company (NAAC) broke many records as an aircraft manufacturer, especially during the war effort in the 1940's. NAAC actually built 41,000 aircraft during the Second World War, earning themselves the title of the largest military aircraft producer in the United States, which they held, until they lost their corporate name, when they were merged with Rockwell in 1967. They might be best known for their T-6 Texan; P-51 Mustang; B-25 Mitchell; F-86 Sabre; and later their F-100 Super Sabre. However they also designed and built the L-17 Navion; the BT-9 Yale; the naval O-47; the NA-68; the B-45 Tornado; the XB-70 Valkyrie; the A-5 Vigilante; the X-15; the OV-10 Bronco and the T-2 Buckeye, amongst many other unique and effective designs.

Shortly after parent company, General Motors had taken The North American Aviation Company (NAAC) public on the US Stock Exchange; NAAC conceived the original design of the Sabreliner as a competitor for the UTX program. Lockheed had won that competition with its JetStar design therefore North American was left with an extremely good, twin-engine executive jet design and prototype, but no buyer. This situation did not last for long though, because the US Air Force was quick to select the North American design for a Twin Jet Utility Trainer requirement that they immediately put out for solicitation. This first version was designated the 'T-39', however at the same time it was informally named the Sabreliner, because it's flying surfaces (Wings and Horizontal Stabilizer) were pretty much identical to those from North Americans F-86 Sabre tactical fighter. (This similarly contested by others in the know, that were associated with the North American Navion, because the Navion's wings were also very similar in design to those that are installed on the P-51 Mustang. NAACs thrifty, but efficient wartime policy was obviously still alive and well, long after the Second World War.)

The first T-39 was delivered to the US Air Force in June of 1961. Later in March of the following year, the Federal Aviation Administration issued a US Type Certificate for the T-39 for civilian use. This first version of the Sabreliner Business Aircraft was designated as a model NA-265 and was directly derived from the military T-39A. It flew with two Pratt and Whitney Turbo Wasp JT12A-6A engines that delivered a take-off thrust of 3,000 lbs each. NAAC was quick to obtain FAA approval of its higher gross weight versions of the T-39B and T-39C; commercially designated as the NA-265-20 and NA-265-30. None of these aircraft were ever sold to the public, because NAAC were using the FAA certification of the T-39 series as a stepping-stone towards the final design approval of the commercial version that NAAC wanted to finally bring to market; the 45,000 foot capable, 3,500 lbs thrust, JT12A-8 engined (as an option) NA-265-40, 'Sabre 40A' (the Sabre 40 retained the lower thrust Dash 6A Wasp engines.)

In 1962 the first ever 'green' Sabre 40A, serial number 282-001 left the NAAC factory in El Segundo, California bound for the Remmert-Werner Company at the Lambert St. Louis International Airport. While here, this NAAC sales demonstrator aircraft was completed and out-fitted with a custom executive interior specifically designed to attract the eye and attention of all large American corporations that were potential buyers of this World's First Twin-Engine Business Jet. Remmert-Werner had become well known in the business aviation field as the leading supplier of post-war C-47/DC3 aircraft that were outfitted for corporate use. Their conversions of the DC-3 variants included the installation of a nose radome and the weather radar system below it, an Airstair door, executive seats, interior wood panelling, picture cabin windows, a refreshment galley, propeller spinners, an enclosed lavatory, one-piece heated windshields and landing gear doors. NAAC felt that by selecting Remmert-Werner as their exclusive outfitter, they would quickly realize brisk sales from an already qualified and established client base.

These feelings were not disappointed as Remmert-Werner was quick to line up the launch customer for the Sabre 40A; The St. Louis based evaporated milk producer, The PET Milk Company. According to the modern-day Sabreliner Corporation, serial number 282-002 was sold and delivered to the PET Milk Company back in October 1963, for $989,982 US Dollars.

During 1964, a new Sabre 40A was sold, completed and delivered to its corporate owner, every 18 days from the Remmert-Werner facilities in St. Louis. As new deliveries continued to flow from both St. Louis and Remmert-Werner's rural facilities south of St. Louis in Perryville, Missouri, NAAC was not resting its laurels. Instead they stretched the Sabre 40A by 38 inches, added more of their signature 'triangular' cabin windows, increased the MGTOW to 20,172 lbs and made the JT12A-8 engines as a standard installation, and called this new variant the NA-265-60, 'Sabre 60.'

Almost immediately before the FAA issued the Type Certificate for the Sabre 60 which happened in April of 1967, in March NAAC caved in to public and governmental pressure to merge with Rockwell Standard Corporation after three astronauts were tragically killed by a fire in their NAAC module atop an Apollo rocket on its launch pad at Cape Canaveral in Florida. This tragedy struck a nerve in American society, and the competence of NAACs management was questioned. Now the company that was manufacturing and selling the Sabreliner changed its name to North American Rockwell (NAR) and the business jet division was named the 'Aviation Services Division.'

Rockwell's General Aviation Division had been busy in building and selling their Aero Commander (AC) series of aircraft. With the merger, NAR overnight, became the world's leading business aviation manufacturer, as their product line now included a piston twin-engined executive transport (AC 500 series), a turbine twin-engined executive transport (AC 680 series), and two turbojet twin-engine executive transport aircraft (Sabre 40 and 60.) By 1970, NAR had even managed to add a single engine piston executive transport aircraft, Rockwell Commander 111 and 112 aircraft to their product line. They seemed unstoppable, especially when viewed in conjunction with their FAA approval of, and delivery of the radically enlarged cabin version of the Sabreliner, the NA-265-70. Everything about the Sabre 70 was big. The MGTOW increased by 828 lbs, cabin headroom leapt up by 11 inches, and the fuselage interior volume jumped from 400 cubic feet, up to 460 cubic feet. Unfortunately the Sabre 70 was grossly underpowered since it still retained the same engine that was installed on the Sabre 40 and 60; the JT-12A-8.

The problem of lack of thrust was fixed by the fortuitous introduction by General Electric, of their CF-700, aft-fan series engine. In 1975 NAR quickly took their 70 model and with the help of this new engine, turned the aircraft into the Sabre 75A/80 model (The FAA Type Certificate was issued in April 1975 for the NA-265-80.) The GE CF700-2D-2 engine produced 1,000 lbs more thrust than the older P&W Wasp turbo-jet. This increased power also enabled NAR to increase the MGTOW of the Sabreliner 75A/80 by an additional 2,300 lbs over the Sabre 70, to 23,300 lbs. This radical change in the fuselage design of the Sabreliner placed the Sabre into a new cabin class. Its true airspeed went up by 5 knots, while its range went back to the same numbers that the Sabre 40 and 60 were delivering, which was approximately 1,350 NM.

The period between the certification and delivery of the Sabre 70 and the Sabre 75A/80, another major corporate upheaval came to pass. This time NAR became Rockwell International and spun off its Sabreliner Aviation Services Division into its own entity which was renamed as their 'Sabreliner Division.' Also its El Segundo production facilities were closed, and all production was moved to its Perryville, Missouri facilities (earlier purchased from Remmert-Werner.)

By the middle of the 1970's, the number and types of business aircraft that were competing for corporate dollars had exploded; Gulfstream, Lockheed, Dassault, Cessna, Learjet and others, all had a 'hat in the ring.' It was obvious that if Rockwell's Sabreliner was to maintain its popularity, a radical increase in range was necessary. For this, the company took a Sabre 60 off the production line, and handed it to the famed engineer, Mr. Jim Raisbeck, formerly of Boeing and Robertson Aircraft, who now had his own company: Raisbeck Engineering Company. Raisbeck started redesigning the Sabre 60 which included the installation of a Super Critical Wing that vastly increased the aerodynamic efficiency of this aircraft. This Raisbeck wing latter became an option on the Sabre 80 models, with their designation being changed by the addition of the letters: 'SC.' The Raisbeck Sabre 60 then was mated up with the then Garrett (now Honeywell) TFE-731-3R turbo-fan engines. The FAA approved this new design by issuing its Type Certificate in November of 1979. It was designated as the NA-265-65 and was known as the Sabre 65.

This winning combination of a Super Critical Wing and newer, better fuel efficient engines which produced 400 lbs more thrust, each, over the original P&W Wasp engines, was able to boost the range up to a total of 2,400 NM. The fact that this Sabreliner could make Honolulu from the Coast of California was a major coup. Additionally its cruise speed increased by 11 KTAS over it's predecessors, while it's operating cost dropped by more than 30%.

It is a crying shame that the next generation version of the 80SC, the larger cabin, more efficient and longer range Sabreliner 85 that was under development at the turn of decade, was culled by Rockwell International. At this same time Rockwell International was deeply invested in both their B1 Bomber and Space Shuttle programs and therefore had lost interest in the business jet industry. In 1983 the entire Sabreliner program was sold to a private investment group who called themselves Sabreliner Corporation. With the behemoth parent company gone, this much smaller private company established their headquarters in St. Louis, and then settled in as a service, parts and support company because the very last Sabreliner ever to roll off the line in Perryville had been delivered to it owner, two years before in 1981.

It would be negligent of me not to mention some of the quirky design features that were unique to most, if not all of the Sabreliner marks that were produced between 1961 and 1981. Firstly many who have opened the main entrance door of any Sabreliner, would note that the door is a fully plugging, type design, meaning that an ingenious door throw system had to be designed to enable the door, which had a larger overall dimension that was larger than its fuselage opening, to swing inward and to then exit out, through and down, until it was fully open. Additionally many, who have entered a Sabreliner, have a witness mark on their foreheads, as there was a bridging entrance step above the door and its opening that required you to step over and duck into the cabin entryway. This was necessitated because the original UTX design competition in the 1950's required that the successful winning design should be able to float, after ditching in the sea. NAAC achieved this by designing a hull-lip at its door, i.e. the door opening was above the actual cabin floor level. In a relatively calm sea environment, a Sabreliner could effectively float indefinitely. This design feature has probably added to the longevity of the T-39, which is still in service with the United States Navy and Marine Corps in Pensacola, Florida, to train flight officer students in radar navigation and airborne radar-intercept procedures, in a vast training area over the Gulf of Mexico. All Sabreliner pilots have, after moving into other aircraft, missed the spectacular view afforded by the eyebrow cockpit windows. The Sabre 65 was the only mark of the series that did not have a 'bail-out-door' mounted behind the underneath/behind the belly mounted 'barn-door' airbrake. Lastly it is extremely interesting to note, that other than the heated pitot tubes, engine inlets and windscreens, virtually none of the Sabreliner 40/60/70/75A/80 series aircraft had any Anti-Ice Systems (the Sabre 65 had wing leading edge heat.) Contrary to this fact, the new factory Sabre 75A aircraft ordered separately by both the FAA, and General Motors Corporation (eight aircraft in total), did have inflatable de-icing boots from BF-Goodrich Corporation installed before they were delivered from Perryville. Amazingly, as far as I can tell, there have only been two accidents that are directly attributable to ice. All marks were certified by the FAA for operations in none icing conditions.

In total, 137 Sabre 40/40A; 144 Sabre 60; 8 Sabre 70; 81 Sabre 75A/80; and 77 Sabre 65 aircraft were built (439 aircraft in total.) Currently more than half the fleet (264) Sabreliners aircraft are still in active operation, which is an incredible tribute to everyone ever involved in the design and production of the World's First Twin-Engine Business Jet.

Next month we shall focus on the Learjet 23.

Okay, I will see you next month as we further continue this look-back at the history of the various aircraft that have shaped modern business aviation. If you have a suggestion for me as to a specific business aircraft that one of these future Business Aviation focus articles should be dedicated to, please let me know your thoughts. Also remember that any input that you care to make will be of great interest to all of the readers here at Globalair.com. So don't be bashful. Go ahead and write your comments and suggestions here. Please don't forget that whatever you write here, can be seen publicly by everyone that visits this page, so please be funny, be inspired, but most importantly of all, please be nice.

Tags: , , , ,

Jeremy Cox

Aero Engines

by Jeremy Cox 1. February 2006 00:00
Share on Facebook

I consider myself very fortunate to have this corner of the world-wide-web to be able to call my own. Rather like a personal ‘Blog', but not quite. I do however pretty much make the decisions regarding what I write about each month, but unlike a ‘Blog' I have to make sure that what I submit to Jeff for posting here, is reasonably accurate and balanced, unlike most ‘Blogs' out there in the ether of the world-wide-web. This concept of relative freedom leads me in to my chosen subject for this month: Aero Engines; ‘The Weird, the Wonderful, the Not So Wonderful and the Downright Insane in the World of Aero Engines.' The spark for this article actually came from my other interest; Motorcycles.

Probably just like you, I get way too many magazines through my letterbox every month. Getting the time to wade my way through them all is pretty hard (I am genuinely impressed by the faithful souls that regularly read my blithering drivel here), however a small beacon of pleasure winks an eye at me every time I see the cover of one of my Motorcycle magazines amongst the normal rubbish of Bills, Credit Card Offers, Charity Appeals and Catalogs for useless Object d'art. In the February 2006 edition of Cycle World (probably my favorite magazine of the bunch), on page 12 Mr. Kevin Cameron has written a fascinating piece about developing engine technology and the concept of testing engines to destruction. He actually cites the work done by the Army Air Development Center in Dayton, Ohio between 1920 through 1926, when single cylinder test engines were run at full blast until they pretty much blew up or stopped running. This concept tickled Mr. Cameron's fancy as it also did mine. I won't spoil his article for you, but I highly recommend that you seek out a copy of this specific edition so you too can read page 12.

When it comes to today's Aero Engines, we are all very much spoilt in this area of aviation technology. Even though the majority of Piston Aero Engine technology still harks back to the 1940's, aero engines in general, turbines especially along with the ‘piston poppers', are extremely reliable. I remember growing up as a child when my mind was an absolute sponge. I would read every aviation book I could lay my hands on. I have flown gliders and I like them, but you still need some form of engine to get even the most modern glider up into the sky, therefore I have always liked to read about Aero Engines. With this and the issue of reliability in mind, I always laughed at the concept of the first Rotary aero engines like the Gnome and Le Rhône which were produced in France circa 1909 and that powered some of the first truly successful powered aircraft during aviation's birth. These five or seven cylinder contraptions had their hollow crankshafts bolted to the firewall, through which a fuel/caster oil/air mixture passed and was thrown centrifugally out to the cylinders that were spinning wildly around the crankshaft at about 20 revolutions every second, creating immense gyroscopic forces on the engine and the airframe to the order of up to 100g's! Of course there was no oil gallery return, so the un-burnt fuel/caster oil mixture flew out of the small exhaust ‘flapper' valves at the end of each cylinder right into the face of the dashing and intrepid pilot who was trying to prevent his frail contraption from auguring into the ground. It really gives a new meaning to the term ‘running ones engine' as the aviators of that period were pretty familiar with the Sir Thomas Crapper's throne courtesy of the laxative properties of the caster oil. Better yet, the primitive carburetors of that time did not normally feature any type of butterfly valve, throttle control and therefore the engine either ran at full tilt or not at all. The previously mentioned pilot with the bowel problems had to control his power output by employing an ignition ‘blip switch' control, in lieu of a throttle i.e. he controlled the opening and closing of the primary coil circuit in the Magneto. I remember reading that on wet days the poor old chap would enjoy the pleasure of blue sparks tingling his thumb every time he ‘blipped' his switch. This brings a whole new level of appreciation to the single FADEC Power Lever in some modern cockpits.

Another memory that comes to mind from my childhood is that the reliability of the first pure-jet turbine engines left an awful lot to be desired. The notable (eventually Nazi) engineers, Herbert Wagner, Otto Mader and Anselm Franz worked together with a staff of hundreds in Magdeburg, Germany, to develop the 8-stage axial compressor, single-stage turbine and afterburning jet-pipe 004A-0 engines that powered the Messerschmitt ME262 in 1942. I recall that the first versions of this engine had a Time Between Overhaul (TBO) of only a couple of hours. The last of this engine variant, the D-4 had a TBO of 30 hours which is truly a far cry from the ten or fifteen thousand plus hours that modern commercial engines regularly attain. Hell some are even certified straight out of the box with an ‘on-condition' TBO, the BMW/Rolls Royce BR710 is an example of this, as installed on the Gulfstream GV/G500/G550 series aircraft!

Let's once again step back in time and continue our next exploration into antiquity, by now remembering the much loved (especially on this side of the Atlantic) Curtiss OX-5 aero engine from 1910? This 320Lb 90HP 1,400 RPM water cooled V8 engine powered the Curtiss JN-4 ‘Jenny' primary trainer. When I first came over to the United States I met a man that proudly wore the OX-5 Club medallion. I had no idea what he was blathering on about until he explained that the OX-5 Club is becoming more and more exclusive every year as members pass away. This is because to be eligible for membership, you must have flown behind and commanded the venerable OX-5 Engine, which was likely mounted on the front end of either a Curtiss JN-4 Jenny or a DeHavilland DH6! We are talking pre 1925 here for these aircraft so unless you are a very fortunate private collector or a lucky pilot at a museum that owns an original or replica, you will probably not becoming a member of this exclusive group anytime soon.

Staying with Piston Engines we are about to make a leap to the other end of the power spectrum (or should I say ‘band'?), i.e. from 90HP to 3,700 HP. Well I have always had a soft spot in both my heart and my head when it comes to ‘Round' Engines. None come any finer in my opinion, than the 18 cylinder Wright R-3350 Turbo Compound Engine, as installed on the ‘Super G' Model Lockheed Constellation. Picture this if you can, you start with the basic layout of a R-3350 as installed on a postwar Boeing B29 Stratofortress, i.e. this baby has Wright Superchargers and Direct Fuel (and Water for take-off boost) Injection. Next you add 3 ‘Blow Down' Turbines spaced 120 degrees apart and feed them from 6 of your 18 cylinders. The rotational power created by the force of the exhaust gasses acting through the Turbines was fed to back to the engines Crankshaft by way of an Inconel X disc, a Stainless Radial Shaft and a Fluid Coupling which was directly geared to the Crank. Wow! These 3 Turbines coupled with some other tweaks here and there, resulted in the basic power output of 2,700 HP being elevated to the great heights of 3,700 HP. If ever you happen to be over in Kansas City, Missouri during daylight hours, you have got to stop at the TWA Museum on the North side of the Downtown Airport. If you are really lucky, you will get to see and hear one or maybe even four of these behemoths' being started (I mean belching smoke and flames while coating the ramp with a generous donation of Mineral Oil) and run, on the museums' restored and flying example of a ‘Super G.' Okay I can almost hear some of you Pratt & Whitney aficionados out there saying what about the P&W R-4360 Compound that was designed and built for the ill-fated B-36? Well I'm sorry to not spout about its 4,000 HP power output. Unfortunately I have never spent any time around this engine therefore it hasn't made the deeply monstrous impression on me like the R-3350 has!

Thinking and writing about the quintessential ‘round engine' has almost made my eyes moist, and therefore a trip down the emotional memory lane of Aero Engines would never be complete if we didn't mention the Royalty of all piston engines, the Rolls Royce Merlin and Griffon series. If you happen to be standing in the garden when one of the following aircraft passes overhead: A Supermarine/Mitchell Spitfire, a North American P51 Mustang, a Hawker Hurricane, a Fairey Seafire, a DeHavilland DH98 Mosquito, an Avro Lancaster, or an Avro Shackleton, you would have just heard the best sounding ‘Vee' 12-cylinder package ever built! Beethoven may rule the sound waves on the ground, but as far as I am concerned, Messer's Henry Royce and Charles Rolls certainly rule the sound waves in the sky! In no small way did this company and its engines prevent me and everyone else like me, from having to speak German as my first language (I hope that my friends from Prussia won't take offence at this remark. Remember how we kicked Napoleon's bottom together in the early 19th Century. Unfortunately Wilhelm and then Hitler in the 20th Century, are the ones that screwed up this age-old relationship). A stock, late-model Merlin will kick out about 2,540 HP at sea level, and will maintain 2,000 HP to at least 20,000 feet barometric. That's 200 HP per cylinder, which is about the same as the R-3350 Turbo Compound engine. Better yet the nutters, a'hem, I mean the highly interesting people who get together every year out in Reno, Nevada, are able to breathe another 1,100 to 1,500 HP into these high-bred works of art which is just mind-blowing to me.

Alright now that we have gone to the extremes with piston aero engines, let's trip the light fantastic into the realm of Turbo-Props and Turbo-Jets/Fans. The most powerful Turbo-Prop engine ever built is Russian. The Kuznetsov engineering group established in 1948 with hundreds of German Prisoners of War and headed up by Comrade Nikolai Dmitriyevich Kuznetsov managed to design and build an engine, the NK-16, which is capable of delivering 14,995 SHP. It powers the Tupolev TU-95, TU-114 and TU-142, along with the Antonov AN-22. Each installation drives massive contra-rotating propellers that are geared down to rotate at an amazingly low, 750 RPM in cruise flight. A totally awesome Powerplant, but statistically the United States and Canada has these engines beaten when judged on profligacy. What I mean by that is that a North American company, Pratt and Whitney (United Technologies Corporation) currently holds the record for producing the most Turbo-Prop and Jet engines of one type, specifically the PT6A series and the JT-8D series. The PT6A, the true workhorse of the worlds varied prop fleet was first introduced as a Helicopter engine in the late 1950's. And even though the Hiller Helicopter Company never did use this engine in any of their helicopters, there have now been more than 33,000 copies of the PT6A series engine delivered new, with new ones still rolling down the production line and there being no end in sight. Additionally Pratt and Whitney also are still just holding on to the lead in the Jet engine arena with worldwide in-service production since 1964 holding a little above 14,000 engines. The gentlemen or should I say the Monsieur's at Snecma/General Electric in France are closely nipping at Pratt's heels with the CFM-56, which is currently at 13,500 engines and counting.

I have researched the business aero engine industry and I have concluded that the Honeywell (Garrett/Allied Signal) TFE-731 series is the most prolific business aircraft engine. Versions of it power Sabreliner, Jetstar, Dassault Falcon, Bombardier Learjet, Cessna Citation, Raytheon Hawker, IAI/Gulfstream and Jet Commander Aircraft models. According to Honeywell's website, so far 11,718 TFE731 engines have been built/delivered, with 51,000,000 operational hours accumulated fleet-wide, while 1,200 of the TFE-731-20/40/60 engines have collectively accumulated more than 1,000,000 operational hours. These are pretty impressive statistics by anyone's standards.

Okay now for the pièce de résistance: the engine that I would like to close with is the Super Daddy of them all. Can you guess what it is? Alright, I have taken quite enough of your time already so I won't delay any longer. The true ‘King of the world' is another engine from the Royal Family of Engine Manufacturers: Rolls Royce. This article would be incomplete if I did not write about the new RR Trent 900 Turbofan. This is the launch engine of the Airbus A380. There are four of these ‘big-daddy's mounted under the wings of the worlds largest passenger aircraft (second only to the Antonov AN225). The A380 has a Maximum Gross Take Off Weight of 1,300,000 Lbs. Just think of that! This is the equivalent of more than 46 individual Hawker 800XP aircraft at their Gross Weight! Each RR Trent 900 has been cleared to eventually certify at 81,000 Lbs of Thrust which is more than 75,000 HP. It is currently being run at 76,500 Lbs, about 71,000 HP. Even though this is a massive lump of metal and plastic that is propelled through the air somewhere in the mid 300 to low 400 Flight Levels at a cruise speed of around Mach 0.85, the fuel consumption in cruise is going to be minimal. The A380 aided by the RR Trent 900 engine, will be the first long-haul aircraft to consume less than three litres of fuel per passenger over 100 kilometers (approximately 81 miles per US gallon) – a fuel burn comparable with the best of the small modern turbo-diesel cars. Wow! To finish with, I actually got some very interesting facts from the Rolls Royce website as they pertain to the RR Trent 900, they are as follows:

  • At take-off, the A380's four Trent 900s will deliver a thrust equivalent equal to the power of more than 3,500 family cars.
  • The engine's hollow, titanium fan blades suck in over 1.25 tons of air every second and could empty four squash courts per second.
  • The fan operates at nearly 3,000rpm with tip speeds at 1.5 times the speed of sound.
  • By the time the air leaves the exhaust it has been accelerated to a speed of nearly 1,000 miles per hour.
  • Temperatures in the engine core are half those on the surface of the sun.
  • The blades in the engine's high pressure system rotate at 12,500 rpm, with tip speeds reaching 1,200 miles per hour.
  • Each Trent 900 has around 20,000 individual components.

As a side note I found fellow Englishman, Mr. Bill Gunston's third edition of his book from 1995, the World Encyclopaedia of Aero Engines, ISBN 1 85260 509 X, extremely useful in the preparation of this article.

So what are your favorite or memorable aero engines?

What's your Good, the Bad and the Ugly List?

Any input that you care to make will be of great interest to all of the readers here at Globalair.com. So please don't be bashful and go ahead and write your comments and suggestions here. Please don't forget that whatever your write here, can be seen publicly by everyone that visits this page, so "be nice."





GlobalAir.com on Twitter